|
|
Post by chedtippington on Mar 11, 2022 18:17:53 GMT
Save your typing finger next time and instead of story time, just type black is bad. No, we're not allowed to say that practically ALL London based knife and drug crime is committed by black gangs, because the truth offends people. Just like we're not allowed to comment on the ethnicity and religion of the vast majority of Child Sex Grooming gangs, or FGM, or terror attacks in the UK (no matter what the liberal left in the civil service keep trotting out to divert). U say u not aloweed but u just did it. Wot next ?? Will that giy be sayin he is canselled from utube on utube |
|
|
|
Post by Deep Space on Mar 12, 2022 7:41:05 GMT
Unless you are entirely hard of thinking, you'd reject the MSM reporting of terrorism, racism & crime statistics outright...wouldn't you?
|
|
|
|
Post by captainblack on Mar 12, 2022 8:19:11 GMT
Its not hard. At least I thought it wasn't. If they dont know the face, it wont make any difference. But,, concentrate now... If they do know the face,, and a lot of suspects are known to security services,,, it just might work. I can imagine the press conference. reporter- Why did you not use the facial recognition technology you have? That would have stopped this known terrorist suspect from getting in the building and killing all these people!! Plod..Well we didnt bother in case we were attacked by a face we dont have on file. Isn't there a carer you can run your ideas past before posting them up Soreen? Yes , a lot of criminals and suspected terrorists are well known to the police, these are the types which the facial recognition will pick up and the police will be able to track these types. I don't have a problem with facial recognition as like the majority of the population , I don't do anything wrong . The only people who need to be concerned are the criminals. |
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 12, 2022 10:34:20 GMT
I'm trying to think why you can't grasp the very simple premise, that the facial recognition now in place, wasn't previously, so wearing a burqa made no difference then, but will now. Actually, I kind of expected it. The only simple premise is that the authorities have a big database of terrorists suspects faces that the technology might pick up on if they are in a particular place , such as Westminster. Yes they could dress up as a woman with a burka on.. yes they might not be on the database... but it should help to prevent those that dont do that.. ie the ones who carried out most previous attacks. And for reasons that , as expected defy any logic or basic reasoning, you are against this. Seemingly because 'they' will know Maureen is going to bingo. Do you ever just fancy taking a day off being you? Terrorists.mdb  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 15, 2022 19:35:25 GMT
Its not hard. At least I thought it wasn't. If they dont know the face, it wont make any difference. But,, concentrate now... If they do know the face,, and a lot of suspects are known to security services,,, it just might work. I can imagine the press conference. reporter- Why did you not use the facial recognition technology you have? That would have stopped this known terrorist suspect from getting in the building and killing all these people!! Plod..Well we didnt bother in case we were attacked by a face we dont have on file. Isn't there a carer you can run your ideas past before posting them up Soreen? Yes , a lot of criminals and suspected terrorists are well known to the police, these are the types which the facial recognition will pick up and the police will be able to track these types. I don't have a problem with facial recognition as like the majority of the population , I don't do anything wrong . The only people who need to be concerned are the criminals. If the quality of the system's output is on a par with the typical CCTV pictures, they could end up arresting a lot of innocent people! |
|
