|
Post by Wilsonwilson on Jan 26, 2022 11:47:29 GMT
So, well over 28,000 unidentified, mainly fighting age Muslim men, arrived on our Kentish shores last year, most trafficked in by Border Farce and the RNLI Water Taxi charity.
This is just the ones the government admit to. Many, many more actually land on the beaches and some of these don't want to be known about and scarper. Some wait for their free lifetime meal ticket and luxury transfer to 4 star hotels in luxury coaches.
I'm not sure how much you lot up North know about the scale if this issue, but down here, it's eye watering with over 1,000 officially being brought in some days. The 2 "Welcoming Centres" (I kind you not) are massive. The new one takes up the entire Cruise Terminal, meaning the cruise industry from Dover is now dead. It's surrounded by 12ft blackout fences to stop the locals and press seeing the scale. One building I work in can see in though, from the second floor. It's huge.
It used to stop in winter and start again in Spring, but it's not stopped this year with 183 minimum arriving yesterday alone.
The civil service have absolutely no intention of deterring the crossings and seemingly, Patel's toothless threats aside, neither do the government.
A lot of the South East is being concreted over to build many tens of thousands of free flats for these guests, who have zero intention of working for a living, as life here on the dole is better than working full time in their own country.
Very few ever get sent back, with most being rescued by lawyers such as what Sadiq Khan used to do and overturn it, often when the flight is on the runway, for added effect.
This won't slow down any time soon and I expect almost 100,000 this year alone at the current rate of increase. Merkel stopped benefits to 270,000 recently as they refused to work, so guess where they're heading next to pretend they've not yet already claimed asylum and been rejected in Europe?
How do we stop this, as it will come back to bite us soon?
No race cards from the usual crew please. This is a genuine concern to people, especially in the thick of it at my end of the country, where towns are becoming unrecognisable in a 5 year period.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 26, 2022 12:15:27 GMT
They'll have more rights than us, well looked after etc.
Police protect the wrong people in this country, not even on race too. The bloke who stabbed to death the woman and the bloke in the car runs him over, charged with murder. Not with potentially stopping more people getting stabbed. Imagine it was a terror attack, you stop it and kill them in the process, yet you get done.
Fucking bonkers country we live in. I'm hoping to move in the next 2 years
|
|
|
Post by Wilsonwilson on Jan 26, 2022 12:31:57 GMT
It's a tricky one.
The small percentage of genuine refugees are being pushed down the list by the vast numbers of Gimmedat chancers with hidden identities.
As for local housing? Indigenous folk around here have almost given up now. The government are demanding tens of thousands of flats be built to cope and they're not being built for locals.
|
|
|
Post by enoch on Jan 26, 2022 13:51:41 GMT
It's a tricky one. The small percentage of genuine refugees are being pushed down the list by the vast numbers of Gimmedat chancers with hidden identities. As for local housing? Indigenous folk around here have almost given up now. The government are demanding tens of thousands of flats be built to cope and they're not being built for locals. we've been on the local authorities social housing list for 9 years, I thought it was less but recently checked. 9 years! In that time we've not even being on the shortlist for a property. I've no doubt in my mind these poor poor souls coming over have played a part, amongst other things. They are rapidly flowing into areas up here Wilson, like a burst sewer pipe, gushing through our streets and with it brings a bad smell. The precinct is riddled with them sat staring at the local girls like predatory twitchers. Do I have sympathy for them, maybe a very small percentage. Kids, women, sure give them a house before me if they have genuinely fled horror, I'd even chuck them a few quid if I had it. But these vulgar young males I hold none for. If a boat was identified as holding young male adults and it got into trouble I wouldn't lose a wink if it went down. Your usual suspects can say as they wish, I travel the entirety of this nation weekly with work, I see the devastion and ghettos these individuals cause. I see the people of this country suffering and forced to live in hives of human waste, brought by parts of this group. The British government has failed its people. Simple.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 27, 2022 15:44:17 GMT
Since we seem unable to keep them out, perhaps persuading potential candidates it's not worth coming here might be more successful. The government is talking of not granting asylum to those who should have claimed elsewhere....but these people know they'll get to remain here anyway. Especially when there is talk of allowing asylum seekers to work in Care (etc?)
So don't let them stay here as a matter of routine. The highest priority should be an offshore processing centre, a long way from here. My preferences would be Russia, China, Japan.....faced with declining populations, they could sweet-talk a lot of these claimants into staying there! Of course, that isn't going to happen.
So that leaves the Falklands as No.1 choice. Knock up some basic accommodation there.....and take a few years to process their claims. Expensive to ship them out there....but so are 4* hotels here. The primary purpose of this strategy is deterrence.....it has to be humane but unpleasant.....and with an international reputation. Treating women/children in this manner might be more problematical....but tough titty.
Currently we have a large inflow of predominantly young males....sexually repressed, and of the theoretical profile of the 'typical' criminal. Not a good state of affairs.
Worth pointing out also that these boat people are in addition to visa overstayers, etc, as well as the Afghan invitees (with their average 6-7 kids/family) and potentially several million Hong Kongers. Population control has to be a much higher priority for British government....leaving the EU has offered a reprieve, but seemingly only a temporary one.
|
|
|
Post by Wilsonwilson on Jan 27, 2022 15:57:37 GMT
Since we seem unable to keep them out, perhaps persuading potential candidates it's not worth coming here might be more successful. The government is talking of not granting asylum to those who should have claimed elsewhere....but these people know they'll get to remain here anyway. Especially when there is talk of allowing asylum seekers to work in Care (etc?) If they've already claimed asylum elsewhere in Europe and failed, hey are not entitled to claim again. This is the reason they bin their ID as soon as they get collected by Border Farce, RNLI water taxis. Some are seen lobbing things overboard as they enter the harbour. These items are most likely EU ID cards or passports from their home country. With no identity, how would you prove the have or should have claimed elsewhere? Like at Patel mouth noises, it's all talk and no action. If what you say is correct, then all should have applied in the first safe country, so all should be rejected. The Dublin Regulation no longer applies to us as we're out of the EU. Nobody entering the Uk is fleeing war torn France, they're here because benefits are better and friends have already settled and created caliphates. Merkel has refused asylum to 270,000 recently, mainly because they refused to work and wouldn't fill the hole in her Labour market. Now with benefits withdrawn, they're mainly heading here. We'll have 100K of them this year, mark my words. The government are already preparing for those sort of numbers with their upgraded "Welcome Centres" on the Western Docks in Dover. At the end of the day, news now travels back to the third world via smartphone and Mohammed, Mohammad and Muhhammed have all phoned Muhammad, Mohammed and Mahamad, to let them know that once here, you never get sent back, get treated as VIP's, fed over priced (to the tax payer), free Turkish food immediately, transferred to luxury hotels on luxury coaches, jump the free housing queue, get spending money, clothes, free education, healthcare and benefits. They never have to work as life here on your 4rse, exceeds life in their country, scratching a living. They are allowed to roam the local areas as soon as they reach the hotels. many are hassling local school girls for sex. It's a big problem around Kent coastal towns. Until you put the lid back on the honey jar, in a modern world of travel and communication, if Western societies have generous benefits systems. the third world will abuse it. It's fairly common for them to sub let out their free flat or house, then return to the country they claim to have fled, to live the life of luxury on UK free cash rent and benefits transferred by Western Union or however. Thousands got caught out in Afghanistan recently and tried to pretend they'd been out there for months on end, attending weddings and funerals. We're mugs. Well, the left centred Civil Service, who can't import "migrant boats = Labour votes" fast enough, are.
|
|
|
Post by Wilsonwilson on Jan 27, 2022 16:25:21 GMT
I'm not sure any braved it in January last year. Most wait until Spring.
This year, already we have over 1,300 extra people to pay for, feed and house. Most of whom are unidentified, fighting age, Muslim men with a hatred for our country other than the generous benefits system.
This will not end well. It's about time the government listened to people instead of just providing lip service.
|
|
|
Post by Wilsonwilson on Feb 3, 2022 20:40:18 GMT
So the Free Home Office have admitted that 37,000 Gimmedats are currently enjoying life in a luxury hotel courtesy of the U.K. tax payer, at a cost of £4.7M A DAY! Something has to give. We’ll get another 100,000 chancers crossing the Channel this year if the recent increases continue at the same rate. www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-60249130That works out at £3800 a month each, plus the clothing and spending money we give them. Yes, they get spending money, but still shoplift everywhere they go around here.
|
|