Today

[gingerbreadman]

Jan 25, 2022 9:33:27 GMT foxtrot777 said:

Jan 24, 2022 21:16:05 GMT gingerbreadman said:

Along with the confrontational tone of his posts, possibly the most significant poster contributing to the demise of the politics board on the 'other place'.

This, how he didn't get banned was amazing, then I suppose admins don't ban their mates.

I think you hit the nail on the head there!

[enoch]

Can't say I dislike any posters now that I've ousted rayner. Porroman is a strange man to say the least, quietly dangerous. As for hukkas/skylarking, we'll there's some issues clearly so I only wish him the best.
I've got to admit, defeating my foe in rayner has left me deflated.

[Wilsonwilson]

It does seem odd how someone so bitter and nasty on the Internet claims to be a comedian in real life.

Split personality disorder maybe?

Is he funny? Anyone seen him?

[turbo2]

Jan 25, 2022 12:54:15 GMT Wilsonwilson said:

It does seem odd how someone so bitter and nasty on the Internet claims to be a comedian in real life.

Split personality disorder maybe?

Is he funny? Anyone seen him?

Funny, like as in piles. No he’s not funny but the wokes love someone throwing the ‘gammon’ around in every sentence.

Obvs the claim that most middle aged white men are angry racist. When in fact the gammon is much more representative of the wokes angry at all non wokes.

[Wilsonwilson]

I never got the whole "gammon" insult.

It's based around the skin colour of those they throw the insult at, claiming anyone who doesn't agree with uncontrolled, unidentified mass Islamic immigration is somehow and angry, pink faced, middle aged male.

Surely the very people hurling this insult are the first to find offence and throw a race card at others, claiming they're attacking people based on nothing but skin colour?

A tad hypcoritical.

Ah, I see, found this on Twitter...

Graeme Rayner

@gag_N_Bone_Man

Replying to

@muhmdibneahmd

Cheers matey.... happy to perform at any Mosque comedy nights... (that's a thing, right?)

Mosque comedy nights? Well at least you won't need to steer away from homophobia and sexist jokes eh? 

I presume the gig wouldn't be open to Muslim women or gay Muslims? 

I do find it odd that he tries so hard to appease a culture which stands against the very principals he claims to defend so strongly.
Gay rights and sexual equality must be out trumped by ethnicity in "Virtue Signalling Top Trumps".

[enoch]

Jan 25, 2022 12:54:15 GMT Wilsonwilson said:

It does seem odd how someone so bitter and nasty on the Internet claims to be a comedian in real life.

Split personality disorder maybe?

Is he funny? Anyone seen him?

he's not funny no. But as turbo said a minority of oddballs do find him humorous. Lots of gammons and Tommy Robinson jokes slung about. Pretty cheap low end stuff. Madeline mccann often chucked into the mix. The problem is he pretty much labels the entire working classes as 'gammon.' which I find odd because he's not someone I'd describe as not being working class.
Listen, he did his stand up class, people encouraged him, wrongfully imo and he's gone from there. A pat on the back and a well done for trying it would have been kinder. He won't hurt anybody and if it keeps the unwell happy and occupied on their evenings then so be it. It keeps them off the streets. The vast majority of his cohort are porroman types that really struggle to find peace in their everyday lives, so what happens is they over socialise, watch loads of sports and go to comedy gigs, it gives them meaning and a list to show their friends and family that they are happy. Leave em to it.

[Deleted]

Gammon jokes slung about by a bloke who looks like a pig.... Very appropriate. That's comedy right there

[captslapper]

Ive never understood how 'gammon'.. a derogatory insult based around someones skin colour to liken them to a food item,, is perfectly acceptable by these hypocrites.

Well, never understood it other than theyre clearly all too thick to see their hypocrisy obviously.

Presumably they enjoy using the term 'chocolate drop' too.. it being a derogatory insult based around skin colour to liken them to a food item.

[Deleted]

Hypocrisy At The Mac

[easylover]

Jan 24, 2022 20:45:26 GMT @htafc1111 said:

Jan 24, 2022 20:38:32 GMT easylover said:

Oh, I understand alright. I see right through you and your ilk. I fucking see you.

Ha, you conspiracy theorists are funny. Your "vaccine hesitancy" is nothing to do with conspiracy theories, but the idea that YOU are the one being played is dismissed out of hand as something altogether different. Selective tin-hattery. Absolutely transparent.


Where do I stand?

The term "vaccine passports" is deliberately provocative and misleading, to try to get a rise from feeble-minded, slack-jawed loons like yourself. In reality, it's just rudimentary infection control. Big event - don't be spreading a virus unnecessarily. No more, no less. It's only something sinister if you imagine it to be so, or buy into the grift about the virus being somehow insignificant - and it isn't insignificant, whatever way you try to spin the numbers. Shameful behaviour, to be honest. You wouldn't fuck around without protection if you had an STD, would you? Actually, don't answer that.

If someone wants to refuse the vaccination, fine. You just don't get to go to large-scale events that put people at risk. It ain't restricting freedoms, it's just expecting the selfish and/or misguided (my words) to own their decisions, for the general health and wellbeing of others. And their immuno-compromised partners they go home to. Or the Cancer-stricken relative they have to drive to the hospital a couple of days after The Game. Or their HIV-positive mate. Or....well, the concept of virus transmission and exponential growth is lost on so many people, it's just not funny.

Hi Hukkas

Not this again.

Wasn't him/her when it last came up, aren't now.

"ooh look - uses the quote button". Lordy, some of us have grown up with the Internet. Or have used other forums - and I don't just mean DATM.

Give it a rest - this obsession you lot have with trying to "unmask" posters is a bit sad, to be honest. If you care so much about identity, then you wouldn't - mostly - be hiding behind pseudonyms. Guessing your birth certificate doesn't say "HalifaxTerrier"?

Not trying to cause any conflict, not trying to start a fight (I'm not called Steve!), you guys just need to chill out a bit, and then we can "chat with freedom of expression". 

[easylover]

Jan 25, 2022 11:02:30 GMT turbo2 said:

Jan 25, 2022 10:13:14 GMT @htafc1111 said:

Amzaing as its used by the same people that ask you for explanations regarding things.

Oh the contradiction

They should change it to CBADSMA

Couldn’t be arsed. Didn’t suit my agenda.

Bit of a self-own there, fella.

Common on t'intenet to summarise a post with "TLDR" because the author knows fine well people won't read it - the person who'll likely not read the whole way through, is the one it refers to, not the author. In other words, the person writing it knows that the reader probably won't be arsed, because it doesn't suit their agenda.

Would be called an "executive summary" in a formal setting, but this is just a football forum, not an academic conference.

Surprised you chaps, who spend so much time on t'internet, don't understand a term used all the time on, well, t'internet. Maybe it's a generational thing.

[captslapper]

Arent you hiding behind a pseudonym of a pseudonym ?

Obviously everyone on here will know you as what you called yourself on DATM, so I dont get why youre afraid or dont have the confidence in yourself to use the same name on here.

As for splitting quotes, ive been on DATM and then on here for over 20 years and I havent got the foggiest how to do that!

[Wilsonwilson]

“Hiding behind pseudonyms”.....

Uses a different account name, so nobody knows who it was on DATM...

I love a bit of WOKESTER Hypocrisy.

[Wilsonwilson]

Jan 25, 2022 19:58:58 GMT captslapper said:

Arent you hiding behind a pseudonym of a pseudonym ?

Obviously everyone on here will know you as what you called yourself on DATM, so I dont get why youre afraid or dont have the confidence in yourself to use the same name on here.

As for splitting quotes, ive been on DATM and then on here for over 20 years and I havent got the foggiest how to do that!

The quoting thing...

On a pc, you switch the tab to BB code at the bottom of the reply window then can either copy all the cobblers within the brackets at the start of the post, if you want it to add the name and time of the poster and post, then finish the quote with an opening square bracket then a forward slash, followed by the word quote, then another square bracket to close.

So to close a quote - [/quote] and to open one the same without the forward slash.

They had to be deliberately put back to front in order, or it would have displayed as a quote box.

[easylover]

Turns out the only other person on here who understands how to do quotes on an Internet messageboard apart from me, is wilsonwilson.

Have you ever seen us in the same room together?

Makes you think.