|
|
Post by captslapper on Mar 10, 2022 20:35:40 GMT
Isn't deploying facial recognition at Westminster just a sensible security measure? It is quite an obvious target for terrorists! If the technology exists Im amazed it isn't already in use. Yes, of course. All criminals and terrorists have up to date passports and photos supplied to the government. None are here and off the radar like the other 5 million or so. It targets and only works against law abiding, genuine registered citizens, Trigger. Why do you have to insult anyone with a different view to your cockeyed one? many criminals and terrorists ARE known to the police Einstein. So if it would stop one of them, then why not use it? How does it 'work against' law abiding genuine citizens exactly? If my face was captured by the technology around Westminster, how would that 'work against me' in any way shape or form? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 10, 2022 20:39:09 GMT
Yes, of course. All criminals and terrorists have up to date passports and photos supplied to the government. None are here and off the radar like the other 5 million or so. It targets and only works against law abiding, genuine registered citizens, Trigger. Why do you have to insult anyone with a different view to your cockeyed one? many criminals and terrorists ARE known to the police Einstein. So if it would stop one of them, then why not use it? How does it 'work against' law abiding genuine citizens exactly? If my face was captured by the technology around Westminster, how would that 'work against me' in any way shape or form? Apparently it would work against you because you'd see adverts for Anal Invader Dildo's that your partner wants to keep secret their purchase of (or vice versa). |
|
|
|
Post by captslapper on Mar 10, 2022 20:50:09 GMT
Is that why he's so against it then? Having one shoved up his arse would at least keep him quiet for a while.  |
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 11, 2022 8:57:39 GMT
Says the bloke who posts under an alias to keep his real life identity hidden.....  Thats not the reason I post under an alias at all...its simply because its the convention on DATM and I just used the same username on here, as that seemed the done thing back when this all started up. I use my real name on a number of other public forums where thats what people do. Yet you joined under the username of "ennius"... Just saying like. Cough Cough... It appears on every post you make, if you use the BB code tab. |
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 11, 2022 9:03:20 GMT
Yes, of course. All criminals and terrorists have up to date passports and photos supplied to the government. None are here and off the radar like the other 5 million or so. It targets and only works against law abiding, genuine registered citizens, Trigger. Why do you have to insult anyone with a different view to your cockeyed one? many criminals and terrorists ARE known to the police Einstein. So if it would stop one of them, then why not use it? How does it 'work against' law abiding genuine citizens exactly? If my face was captured by the technology around Westminster, how would that 'work against me' in any way shape or form? But many aren't are they? It's pointless trying to debate with you, when you refuse to accept fact. Facial recognition does not work on anyone in the country illegally, off the radar or wearing face coverings for claimed religious excuses. This is a fact. There are areas in London where almost half the people are so well covered up, you won't know who they are. This demographic is where the vast majority of terrorists in the Uk come from. It only works for people here legally, who are legitimate citizens, with a real passport or government photo ID, such as a driving licence, so are on the government system. |
|
|
|
Post by captslapper on Mar 11, 2022 9:36:45 GMT
Its not hard. At least I thought it wasn't.
If they dont know the face, it wont make any difference.
But,, concentrate now...
If they do know the face,, and a lot of suspects are known to security services,,, it just might work.
I can imagine the press conference.
reporter- Why did you not use the facial recognition technology you have? That would have stopped this known terrorist suspect from getting in the building and killing all these people!!
Plod..Well we didnt bother in case we were attacked by a face we dont have on file.
Isn't there a carer you can run your ideas past before posting them up Soreen?
|
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 11, 2022 10:06:53 GMT
Its not hard. At least I thought it wasn't. If they dont know the face, it wont make any difference. But,, concentrate now... If they do know the face,, and a lot of suspects are known to security services,,, it just might work. I can imagine the press conference. reporter- Why did you not use the facial recognition technology you have? That would have stopped this known terrorist suspect from getting in the building and killing all these people!! Plod..Well we didnt bother in case we were attacked by a face we dont have on file. Isn't there a carer you can run your ideas past before posting them up Soreen? Which part of "it only works for genuine, legally registered citizens, not covering their face with a burqa" are you failing to grasp? The estimated up to a million illegal immigrants in London, who make up a large proportion of violent crime gangs, are immune to it, as are the million or so burqa wearers in East London. It tracks Sharon, the lady who does the check out at the local supermarket, but not Ngumbe, the toothless Somalian who wanders around hacking at people with a machete. If you can't see the problem with this, you're either lying to create an argument or as thick as mince. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2022 10:20:45 GMT
Thats not the reason I post under an alias at all...its simply because its the convention on DATM and I just used the same username on here, as that seemed the done thing back when this all started up. I use my real name on a number of other public forums where thats what people do. Yet you joined under the username of "ennius"... Just saying like. Cough Cough... It appears on every post you make, if you use the BB code tab. Yes, that was my DATM username at the time I joined here, which I then changed on DATM (as I do every so often - mainly because it winds some people up for no discernible reason!), and so changed the username on here to match. ...to follow the convention that is established...like I said. WTF are you even going on about?! |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2022 10:45:06 GMT
Its not hard. At least I thought it wasn't. If they dont know the face, it wont make any difference. But,, concentrate now... If they do know the face,, and a lot of suspects are known to security services,,, it just might work. I can imagine the press conference. reporter- Why did you not use the facial recognition technology you have? That would have stopped this known terrorist suspect from getting in the building and killing all these people!! Plod..Well we didnt bother in case we were attacked by a face we dont have on file. Isn't there a carer you can run your ideas past before posting them up Soreen? Which part of "it only works for genuine, legally registered citizens, not covering their face with a burqa" are you failing to grasp? The estimated up to a million illegal immigrants in London, who make up a large proportion of violent crime gangs, are immune to it, as are the million or so burqa wearers in East London. It tracks Sharon, the lady who does the check out at the local supermarket, but not Ngumbe, the toothless Somalian who wanders around hacking at people with a machete. If you can't see the problem with this, you're either lying to create an argument or as thick as mince. Maybe we should ask someone in CTU how many people they are aware of and watching. As has been pointed out, if that number is more than zero then facial recognition is potentially a benefit and stopping some crime. Your argument here seems to follow your broken understanding of how vaccines work - "it doesnt prevent 100% of people from potentially getting ill if and when they catch Covid, it might also have an adverse affect on a small number of people - therefore it shouldn't be offered", whilst totally ignoring the bigger numbers. |
|
|
|
Post by sabre on Mar 11, 2022 12:10:47 GMT
Is that why he's so against it then? Having one shoved up his arse would at least keep him quiet for a while.  Doubtful. |
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 11, 2022 12:12:52 GMT
Is that why he's so against it then? Having one shoved up his arse would at least keep him quiet for a while. Doubtful. As you pull people up for posting on topic stuff, can i just say... Tedious. Have a few days off if you can't post anything on topic eh?  |
|
|
|
Post by captslapper on Mar 11, 2022 12:14:33 GMT
Its not hard. At least I thought it wasn't. If they dont know the face, it wont make any difference. But,, concentrate now... If they do know the face,, and a lot of suspects are known to security services,,, it just might work. I can imagine the press conference. reporter- Why did you not use the facial recognition technology you have? That would have stopped this known terrorist suspect from getting in the building and killing all these people!! Plod..Well we didnt bother in case we were attacked by a face we dont have on file. Isn't there a carer you can run your ideas past before posting them up Soreen? Which part of "it only works for genuine, legally registered citizens, not covering their face with a burqa" are you failing to grasp? The estimated up to a million illegal immigrants in London, who make up a large proportion of violent crime gangs, are immune to it, as are the million or so burqa wearers in East London. It tracks Sharon, the lady who does the check out at the local supermarket, but not Ngumbe, the toothless Somalian who wanders around hacking at people with a machete. If you can't see the problem with this, you're either lying to create an argument or as thick as mince. Go ask your carer Soreen. Will the face recognition work on a known person on their terrorist database of which there are hundreds/thousands? Ever read the phrase ' the suspect was known to the police' ? As you clearly never get beyond the headline, probably not. Jesus wept. You dream about being as thick as mince lad! Even by your standards this is being incredibly dumb. |
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 11, 2022 12:17:27 GMT
As has been pointed out, if that number is more than zero then facial recognition is potentially a benefit and stopping some crime. So, what you're saying is, you're OK with the establishment concentrating on following you around, as a law abiding citizen, watching your every move, than putting that effort into looking for criminals here illegally. The illegal criminals who get a free pass from the government's latest brainfart to increase security. I take it you realise this will be used to justify removing even more real policing from the streets? As a law abiding, tax paying, legal resident of the UK, it seems a bizarre view to me, but hey, ho. Each to their own. |
|
|
|
Post by clappyhapper on Mar 11, 2022 12:19:32 GMT
o ask your carer Soreen. thick as mince lad! .... incredibly dumb. Phew, it's lucky it's only me who posts with an aggressive tone eh? |
|
|
|
Post by sensibleidiot on Mar 11, 2022 12:28:08 GMT
As has been pointed out, if that number is more than zero then facial recognition is potentially a benefit and stopping some crime. So, what you're saying is, you're OK with the establishment concentrating on following you around, as a law abiding citizen, watching your every move, than putting that effort into looking for criminals here illegally. The illegal criminals who get a free pass from the government's latest brainfart to increase security. I take it you realise this will be used to justify removing even more real policing from the streets? As a law abiding, tax paying, legal resident of the UK, it seems a bizarre view to me, but hey, ho. Each to their own. I work for a Law Enforcement Agency… I can guarantee you, mr paranoid - they’re out to get me - law abiding citizen, that no one in law enforcement gives a flying fuck what you get up to…. No one is going to be watching you go to the bookies or the pub or your ‘nutters are us’ meetings. ….. Westminster killings, Manchester arena etc etc…. Suspects known to police. Huge outcry that we should have been keeping an eye on them …. Well, this may just be another way of doing so, which may in turn save lives. If LEA’s need to track me doing my Aldi shop to stop these type of atrocities, then it’s fine by me. |
|
